努比亚 Z70 Ultra 评测
尺寸比较
Nubia Z70 Ultra Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S24+ Google Pixel 9 Pro DIN A6 ❌
功能 - USB 3.2 和红外触发器提供的功能与前代手机并无太大区别。其中，现在使用的是速度更快的 USB 端口规格，在我们的文件拷贝测试中，传输速率超过了 1GB/s。它还支持有线图像输出，但遗憾的是仅限于简单地镜像手机屏幕上显示的内容。
它还集成了红外线发射器，可以遥控空调、电视和其他兼容产品。
软件 -Android 15，仅承诺一次更新努比亚 Z70 Ultra 运行谷歌Android 15，拥有自己的 Nebula AI OS 用户界面。
这听起来很有前景，但真正实现的人工智能功能却很少。其中包括通话时的实时翻译和无线信号的智能优化。
努比亚有一个非常基本的Android 更新政策。对于这款手机，只有一个Android 版本更新。努比亚承诺三年内持续发布安全补丁。不过，根据以往的经验，更新都是零星推出的。在测试时，最后一个补丁是 2024 年 10 月 1 日发布的，因此相对来说是最新的。
可持续性交货时，外包装全部用薄膜包裹，包装盒内还有大量塑料。
努比亚没有提供任何有关使用可回收材料或产品可回收性的信息。此外，也没有关于智能手机二氧化碳排放量的可持续发展报告或数据。
Z70 Ultra 不具备用户维修功能，因为努比亚没有提供说明书或备件供用户购买。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 适用于努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的三频全球导航卫星系统努比亚 Z70 Ultra 配备了 Wi-Fi 7、蓝牙 5.4 和 5G，支持最新的通信标准。虽然可用频段的范围在我们看来不错，但这款智能手机并不是真正为全球使用而设计的。
在使用我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 进行的 iPerf 测试中，Z70 Ultra 实现了较高且稳定的传输速率。
NetworkingNubia Z70 UltraWi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1003 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
891 (min: 823) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1945 (min: 971) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1862 (min: 1729) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProWi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
993 (min: 953) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
565 (min: 427) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1864 (min: 929) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1549 (min: 1517) MBit/s ∼83%
Google Pixel 9 ProWi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 858) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
795 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1830 (min: 1666) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1602 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S24+Wi-Fi 6E iperf3 transmit AXE11000
859 (min: 401) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
648 (min: 582) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1581 (min: 1247) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1117 (min: 1031) MBit/s ∼60%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm FastConnect 7800 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1005 (min: 506) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
969 (min: 482) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1852 (min: 1711) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1678 (min: 1565) MBit/s ∼90%
Average Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1040 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1038 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1541 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1525 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼82%
Average of class Smartphone iperf3 transmit AXE11000
707 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
734 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1327 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1390 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼75%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1913 (971-1969) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1833 (929-1912) Nubia Z70 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1854 (1729-1901) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1548 (1517-1569) Nubia Z70 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø987 (508-1019) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø993 (953-1015) Nubia Z70 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø888 (823-978) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø564 (427-612)
楼内 GPS 测试
户外 GPS 测试努比亚 Z70 Ultra 支持最常见卫星导航网络的三频连接，在我们的自行车骑行测试中提供了出色的路线映射。
试骑自行车环湖骑行
试骑自行车转折点
试骑自行车总结电话功能和语音质量努比亚 Z70 Ultra 可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡，但不支持 eSIM。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能。
将智能手机贴近耳朵时，语音质量很好，但嘈杂的环境噪声会影响语音质量和清晰度。在免提模式下，用户的声音听起来很刺耳，但总体来说，音质还是可以接受的。
相机 - 可变光圈和物理快门按钮努比亚 Z70 Ultra 自拍照努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的前置摄像头分辨率有所提升，质量与前代手机相比略有改善，但仍未达到预期效果。此外，它只能以每秒 30 帧的速度录制全高清视频。
真正的主角是背面的三摄像头，它得到了大量改进。例如，主镜头现在配备了可变光圈。虽然镜头仍然基于 35 毫米格式，但也可以在设置中切换为 24 毫米。它拍摄的图像往往看起来不错，但在弦光条件下，会有很多曝光过度的区域。除此之外，该镜头的细节和动态范围都很出色。
超广角镜头也采用了新的传感器。该镜头现在还能进行微距拍摄。潜望镜变焦的工作范围为 70 毫米，但在相机应用程序中，实际提供的是 85 毫米，EXIF 数据也证实了这一点。在最大 140 毫米的情况下也能获得不错的效果。最大变焦级别为 50 倍（1,750 毫米）。
视频可录制成 8K（30 FPS）、4K（30、60、120 FPS）、全高清（30、60 FPS）和 720p（30 FPS）格式。不过，视频防抖功能最高只能达到 4K60。主镜头和长焦镜头都具有光学防抖（OIS）功能，当智能手机晃动时会产生明显的嘎嘎声。
手机右侧边缘还有一个相机按钮，拍摄时可用作开始/停止按钮，拍照时不仅可用作快门释放按钮，还有一个用于自动对焦的压力点。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Lightclick to load imagesNubia Z70 UltraSamsung Galaxy S24Apple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNubia Z70 UltraSamsung Galaxy S24Apple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNubia Z70 UltraSamsung Galaxy S24Apple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNubia Z70 UltraSamsung Galaxy S24Apple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNubia Z70 UltraSamsung Galaxy S24Apple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
10.5 ∆E7.5 ∆E10.7 ∆E11.5 ∆E9.3 ∆E8 ∆E8.1 ∆E10.7 ∆E8.5 ∆E6.2 ∆E6.6 ∆E5.6 ∆E10.7 ∆E12.3 ∆E10.4 ∆E2.5 ∆E8.4 ∆E15.3 ∆E5.7 ∆E2 ∆E5.9 ∆E6.9 ∆E1 ∆E3.4 ∆EColorChecker Nubia Z70 Ultra: 7.83 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 15.3 ∆E29.1 ∆E51.3 ∆E37.5 ∆E34.3 ∆E41.5 ∆E59.4 ∆E50.4 ∆E31.1 ∆E37.9 ∆E26.5 ∆E61.3 ∆E61.6 ∆E27.4 ∆E45.4 ∆E32.8 ∆E71.3 ∆E38.5 ∆E40.1 ∆E76.4 ∆E68.4 ∆E50.8 ∆E36.6 ∆E24 ∆E13.5 ∆EColorChecker Nubia Z70 Ultra: 43.63 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 76.35 ∆E
Nubia Z70 UltraNubia Z70 Ultra
配件和保修 - 努比亚 Z70 Ultra 随附电源适配器Z70 Ultra 随附模块化充电器（80 瓦）、USB-C 数据线、哑光硅胶保护盖和 SIM 卡工具。
虽然努比亚提供了各种可选配件，但保护壳只能从第三方供应商处购买。制造商在德国只提供 12 个月的保修，这与 经销商保修.
输入设备 - 光学指纹传感器努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的电容式触摸屏工作可靠，可快速处理输入。显示屏内嵌光学指纹传感器，能可靠地识别指纹并快速解锁智能手机。面部识别功能也可通过前置摄像头实现，但往往难以识别用户，尤其是在弱光环境下，而且并不安全。
滑动开关可用于启动相机应用或执行其他操作。这可以在设置菜单中进行调整。专用相机按钮也是如此。
线性振动电机可提供清晰的触觉反馈，但声音可能有点大。
显示屏 - 高达 144 Hz 的明亮 AMOLED 显示屏子像素结构努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的 6.9 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏拥有高分辨率，并首次支持高达 144 Hz 的刷新率。不过，由于不是 LTPO 面板，刷新率最低只能降至 60 Hz。
努比亚提高了亮度。在激活环境光传感器显示纯白图像时，我们在屏幕中央测得的亮度为 1,331 cd/m²。如果缩小白色区域的大小（APL18），亮度会增加到 1,753 cd/m²。播放 HDR 视频时，亮度为 1,840 cd/m²。
我们的测量结果表明，OLED 面板以 60 Hz 的恒定频率闪烁，振幅曲线足够稳定（但我们仍希望它能更平缓一些）。高频 PWM 调光功能也已搭载，其工作频率据称高达 2,160 Hz。我们甚至在最低亮度下测到了更高的频率。虽然测得的闪烁不太可能导致健康问题，但敏感的人在订购这款手机前还是应该三思而后行。
1299cd/m²1329cd/m²1398cd/m²1305cd/m²1331cd/m²1413cd/m²1300cd/m²1321cd/m²1378cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 1413 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1341.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.19 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 92 %Center on Battery: 1331 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.29CCT: 6321 K
Nubia Z70 UltraAMOLED, 2688x1216, 6.9"Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8"Google Pixel 9 ProOLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"Samsung Galaxy S24+AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"Screen7%27%-58%-31%Brightness middle (cd/m²)13311682 26%2083 56%1358 2%1003 -25%Brightness (cd/m²)13421685 26%2016 50%1358 1%997 -26%Brightness Distribution (%)9297 5%84 -9%92 0%97 5%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.21.1 8%0.7 42%3 -150%1.4 -17%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *1.82.1 -17%2 -11%4.4 -144%3.1 -72%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.61.7 -6%1.1 31%2.5 -56%2.4 -50%Gamma2.29 96%2.27 97%2.22 99%1.98 111%2.22 99%CCT6321 103%6581 99%6560 99%6656 98%6119 106%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 HzAmplitude: 27.02 %Secondary Frequency: 2222 HzThe display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8118 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
最低显示亮度
25 % 显示屏亮度
显示屏亮度为 50
75 % 显示亮度
最大显示亮度（手动设置）固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下的测量结果（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这是由于缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下振幅的放大版本，以便更加清晰）。
面板色彩表现出色。饱和度并没有失控，这一点令人惊叹。
灰度（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
ColorChecker （色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
色彩空间（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
饱和度扫描（色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7075 ms rise↘ 0.7585 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey1.03 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5125 ms rise↘ 0.5215 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).
只要环境光传感器处于激活状态，努比亚手机就能为户外使用提供足够的亮度。手动调节亮度时，最大亮度限制在 611 cd/m²。
其可视角度稳定性良好。在平视角下亮度略有下降，但不会出现色彩衰减。
努比亚 Z70 Ultra 户外
视角性能 - 骁龙 8 精英版努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的核心是一个 骁龙 8 精英版根据配置的不同，它配备了 12、16 或 24 GB LPDDR5x 内存。
Z70 Ultra 的性能非常高，但由于散热限制，SoC 的全部潜能可能永远无法得到充分发挥，与 ROG Phone 9 Pro 的对比就证明了这一点。此外，Z70 Ultra 的 AI 基准成绩也没有达到预期。
Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreAsus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
3215 Points +2%Nubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3144 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2309 - 3228, n=28)
3048 Points -3%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2251 Points -28%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
2066 Points -34%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1971 Points -37%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=212, last 2 years)
1754 Points -44% Multi-CoreAsus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
10323 Points +7%Nubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9620 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7656 - 10401, n=28)
9175 Points -5%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
7036 Points -27%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
6534 Points -32%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=212, last 2 years)
5119 Points -47%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4820 Points -50%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
2956859 Points +17%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2090799 - 3015111, n=20)
2660168 Points +5%Nubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2534428 Points Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1983872 Points -22%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1777871 Points -30%Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=152, last 2 years)
1487579 Points -41%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1139380 Points -55%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
27169 Points Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
26863 Points -1%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (14366 - 27428, n=23)
20566 Points -24%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
20446 Points -25%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
17534 Points -35%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=188, last 2 years)
14853 Points -45%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
11823 Points -56%CrossMark - Overall
Nubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2093 Points Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
2044 Points -2%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1064 - 2674, n=18)
1887 Points -10%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1395 Points -33%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1290 Points -38%Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=126, last 2 years)
1143 Points -45%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1021 Points -51%BaseMark OS II
OverallNubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
12993 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8155 - 14066, n=19)
11251 Points -13%Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
10677 Points -18%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
9467 Points -27%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8148 Points -37%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
7716 Points -41%Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 16690, n=148, last 2 years)
7682 Points -41% SystemNubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
17953 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (10849 - 20776, n=19)
15801 Points -12%Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
15745 Points -12%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
15253 Points -15%Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 21153, n=148, last 2 years)
11440 Points -36%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11329 Points -37%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
8029 Points -55% MemoryNubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18911 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7081 - 20572, n=19)
13523 Points -28%Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
12408 Points -34%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
10197 Points -46%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
10178 Points -46%Average of class Smartphone (962 - 24052, n=148, last 2 years)
8710 Points -54%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8266 Points -56% GraphicsAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (35063 - 384996, n=19)
59181 Points +67%Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
38586 Points +9%Nubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
35527 Points Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
26972 Points -24%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=148, last 2 years)
25884 Points -27%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
25796 Points -27%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
23041 Points -35% WebNubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2363 Points Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1998 Points -15%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1202 - 2370, n=19)
1908 Points -19%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1879 Points -20%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1745 Points -26%Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
1724 Points -27%Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2468, n=148, last 2 years)
1703 Points -28%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
36578 Points +313%Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=137, last 2 years)
19755 Points +123%Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
19134 Points +116%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8865 - 22767, n=17)
17519 Points +98%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
11342 Points +28%Nubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
8865 Points AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=126, last 2 years)
27034 Points +1325%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (787 - 307528, n=16)
20815 Points +997%Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
1971 Points +4%Nubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1897 Points Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1146 Points -40%Samsung Galaxy S24+Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1121 Points -41%Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
754 Points +92%Average of class Smartphone (122 - 4122, n=40, last 2 years)
607 Points +54%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (267 - 754, n=5)
535 Points +36%Nubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
393 Points Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
376 Points -4%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
374 Points -5% Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4176 Points +1169%Average of class Smartphone (122 - 32120, n=40, last 2 years)
2351 Points +615%Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
755 Points +129%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (271 - 755, n=5)
523 Points +59%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
374 Points +14%Nubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
329 Points Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
6269 Points +689%Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44381, n=40, last 2 years)
3482 Points +338%Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
1765 Points +122%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (641 - 1765, n=5)
1219 Points +53%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
804 Points +1%Nubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
795 Points AI Benchmark
Score V5Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
3177 Points +2219%Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=42, last 2 years)
829 Points +505%Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
287 Points +109%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (137 - 287, n=4)
234 Points +71%Nubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
137 Points Score V6Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (302 - 17293, n=15)
9205 Points +2948%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5170 Points +1612%Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22149, n=74, last 2 years)
4724 Points +1464%Google Pixel 9 ProGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1112 Points +268%Asus ROG Phone 9 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
770 Points +155%Nubia Z70 UltraQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
302 Points
集成的 Adreno 830 GPU 负责图形处理。这正是努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的真正优势所在，它能提供出色的效果。
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5846 Points Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5575 Points -5%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5009 Points -14%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4235 Points -28%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points -55%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5906 Points Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5642 Points -4%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5105 Points -14%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4256 Points -28%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2547 Points -57%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22004 Points Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
21065 Points -4%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20321 Points -8%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13098 Points -40%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9476 Points -57%3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10059 Points Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
9430 Points -6%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8791 Points -13%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8774 Points -13%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10075 Points Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
9447 Points -6%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9262 Points -8%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8765 Points -13%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2155 Points Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2039 Points -5%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1765 Points -18%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1026 Points -52%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2159 Points Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2047 Points -5%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1826 Points -15%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1001 Points -54%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
10259 Points +7%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9622 Points Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7199 Points -25%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5602 Points -42%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35552 Points Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
33560 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23545 Points -34%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16300 Points -54%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
22303 Points 0%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22236 Points Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15675 Points -30%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11444 Points -49%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps +177%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
765 fps +42%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
537 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
415 fps -23%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
378 fps -30%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps +177%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
457 fps +129%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
310 fps +55%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
245 fps +23%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
200 fps GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps +177%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps +73%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
335 fps +95%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
244 fps +42%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
172 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
165 fps -4%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
154 fps +157%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps +13%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -10%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
216 fps +48%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
152 fps +4%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
146 fps Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
139 fps -5%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps -42%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
144 fps +140%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps +13%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -22%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps +30%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86 fps Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps -13%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -27%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -49%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps +177%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps +38%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps +28%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
263 fps +48%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
202 fps +13%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
178 fps Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
176 fps -1%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -33%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps +13%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps -17%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps -26%Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -57%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Nubia Z70 Ultra (Edge 131)
288.938 Points Nubia Z70 Ultra (Chrome 131)
89.739 Points -69%Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)
240.864 Points -17%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (75.1 - 329, n=17)
223 Points -23%Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=153, last 2 years)
155.7 Points -46%Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
139.087 Points -52%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
108.429 Points -62%Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Nubia Z70 Ultra (Edge 131)
393 runs/min Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (244 - 603, n=9)
393 runs/min 0%Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)
382 runs/min -3%Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
260 runs/min -34%Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=128, last 2 years)
227 runs/min -42%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
207 runs/min -47%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)
25.9 runs/min +7%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 36.8, n=16)
24.6 runs/min +2%Nubia Z70 Ultra (Edge 131)
24.2 runs/min Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
15.8 runs/min -35%Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=125, last 2 years)
14.5 runs/min -40%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Nubia Z70 Ultra (Edge 131)
207 Points Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)
195 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
176 Points -15%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (102 - 255, n=17)
170.4 Points -18%Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=147, last 2 years)
147.3 Points -29%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
106 Points -49%Octane V2 - Total Score
Nubia Z70 Ultra (Edge 131)
94399 Points Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)
72825 Points -23%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (25448 - 95506, n=24)
70725 Points -25%Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
63452 Points -33%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
60566 Points -36%Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=200, last 2 years)
49133 Points -48%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version (Chrome 129)
26537 Points -72%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=155, last 2 years)
1149 ms * -163%Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
699 ms * -60%Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
630.8 ms * -44%Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)
573.9 ms * -31%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 1170, n=19)
553 ms * -26%Nubia Z70 Ultra (Edge 131)
437.5 ms * * ... smaller is better
Nubia Z70 UltraAsus ROG Phone 9 ProGoogle Pixel 9 ProSamsung Galaxy S24+Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-55%-65%-44%5%-13%-42% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)4107.664026.96 -2%1717.9 -58%2450.9 -40%3995.95 -3%3675 ?(1851 - 4512, n=48) -11%2223 ?(270 - 4370, n=195, last 2 years) -46% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)3145.553773.6 20%253.53 -92%1523.87 -52%3065.04 -3%3072 ?(1494 - 4030, n=48) -2%1838 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=195, last 2 years) -42% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)437.83441.13 1%218.41 -50%387.42 -12%483.2 10%382 ?(250 - 504, n=48) -13%295 ?(47.6 - 576, n=195, last 2 years) -33% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)633.68637.2 1%261.55 -59%176.19 -72%729.58 15%463 ?(45.7 - 964, n=48) -27%335 ?(9.4 - 964, n=195, last 2 years) -47%
Games
Nubia Z70 Ultra; Dead Trigger 2; 2.1.0: Ø143.4 (125-145) Nubia Z70 Ultra; League of Legends: Wild Rift; High Definition: Ø119.7 (114-121) Nubia Z70 Ultra; League of Legends: Wild Rift; max: Ø60 (57-61) Nubia Z70 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.5.0: Ø118.1 (106-121) Nubia Z70 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø60 (55-61) Nubia Z70 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.5.0: Ø40 (36-41)
排放--努比亚可能会变得相当热温度相机镜头下有水汽凝结的 Z70 Ultra（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）与 Z60 Ultra 领先版的情况类似，Z70 Ultra 在持续负载下的触感也会变得不舒适，某些区域的温度会升至 63°C 以上，这实在太高了。虽然这种情况在日常使用中不太可能发生，但像 Burnout 基准这样的压力测试确实会导致温度飙升，从而引起软件干预并停止对组件造成压力的应用程序。此外，由于温度过高，主摄像头的镜头下会出现冷凝现象。幸好智能手机冷却后，这种现象就会消失。
不出所料，SoC 在持续负载下会出现节流。值得庆幸的是，时钟速度和性能下降并不严重。
Max. LoadIdle
60.9 °C56.8 °C50.1 °C 63.3 °C60 °C49 °C 63.7 °C52.2 °C46.8 °C
Maximum: 63.7 °CAverage: 55.9 °C
50.6 °C48.7 °C45.5 °C48.1 °C46.9 °C44.2 °C44.7 °C46.7 °C42 °C
Maximum: 50.6 °CAverage: 46.4 °C Power Supply (max.) 28.4 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
29.8 °C29.3 °C29.3 °C 29.6 °C29.1 °C30.6 °C 30 °C29.1 °C30 °C
Maximum: 30.6 °CAverage: 29.6 °C
27.8 °C28 °C28.2 °C28.2 °C28.1 °C27.9 °C28.1 °C27.9 °C28.1 °C
Maximum: 28.2 °CAverage: 28 °C Power Supply (max.) 27.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 55.9 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 63.7 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.6 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityAsus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
90.5 % +19%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.1 % +8%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 % Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.6 % -11%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 % -24% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestAsus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
90.6 % +17%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.5 % +6%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77.2 % Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 % -10%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.6 % -23% Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityAsus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.5 % +11%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80.3 % Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 % -14%Samsung Galaxy S24+Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.5 % -26% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityAsus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.2 % +14%Asus ROG Phone 9 ProAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.8 % +3%Nubia Z70 UltraAdreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
87.2 % Google Pixel 9 ProMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77.3 % -11%Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionAdreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.7 % -18%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø31 (27.2-35.2) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø32.2 (30.7-33.8) Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø115.1 (98.4-129.4) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø118.2 (112.9-124.7) Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø131.2 (127.7-131.8) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø124.9 (124.6-126.2) Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø30.9 (27.4-33.7) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø31.5 (31.4-31.5) Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø30.8 (26.8-33.3) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø30.1 (27.8-31.1) Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15.6 (14.1-16.2) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3, with Fan: Ø15.2 (15.2-15.3) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15 (13.7-15.3)
发言人努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的两个扬声器可提供稳定的音效，但音质略显单薄，全音量时还会有轻微失真。
有线耳机只能通过 USB-C 接口连接。对于无线耳机，有一套可靠的蓝牙编解码器可供选择。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Nubia Z70 Ultra audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 努比亚采用硅碳技术耗电量我们记录的数据在预期范围内。在最大显示亮度下，手机的耗电量比我们希望的要大一些。
Z70 Ultra 不支持无线充电，但提供高达 80 瓦的快速充电功能。使用随机附带的电源适配器，充满电仅需 47 分钟，18 分钟可充至 50%，33 分钟可充至 80%。这不禁让人担心电池的长期健康状况以及快速充电过程对电池的友好程度。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.11 / 0.2 WattIdle 0.8 / 2.06 / 2.1 Watt
Load
8.01 / 18.7 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Nubia Z70 Ultra6150 mAhAsus ROG Phone 9 Pro5800 mAhGoogle Pixel 9 Pro4700 mAhSamsung Galaxy S24+4900 mAhNubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version6000 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption1%24%38%20%2%20%Idle Minimum * (Watt)0.80.99 -24%0.59 26%0.43 46%0.7 12%1.101 ?(0.42 - 3.8, n=23) -38%0.848 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=164, last 2 years) -6%Idle Average * (Watt)2.061.08 48%1.1 47%0.84 59%1.55 25%1.672 ?(0.87 - 4.2, n=23) 19%1.435 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=164, last 2 years) 30%Idle Maximum * (Watt)2.11.14 46%1.2 43%0.95 55%1.61 23%1.893 ?(0.94 - 4.8, n=23) 10%1.621 ?(0.77 - 4.46, n=164, last 2 years) 23%Load Average * (Watt)8.0112.97 -62%7.15 11%6.76 16%8.88 ?(5.8 - 13, n=18) -11%6.99 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=141, last 2 years) 13%Load Maximum * (Watt)18.719.21 -3%20.37 -9%16.42 12%13 ?(8.86 - 19.5, n=18) 30%11.3 ?(3.53 - 22, n=141, last 2 years) 40%* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.59 (1.206-21.6) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.15 (1.439-19.1) Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.202 (1.134-1.515) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.942 (0.853-1.818)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.78 (4.72-11.3) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15 (12.6-17.4) Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.202 (1.134-1.515) Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.942 (0.853-1.818)
电池寿命6,150 mAh 锂离子电池使用硅碳负极来提高能量密度，该技术由Honor 首次引入。 Magic V2.
因此，虽然电池续航时间略逊于前代产品，但也非常出色。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 131)
21h 49min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Nubia Z70 Ultra6150 mAh
21.8 h Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro5800 mAh
21 h Google Pixel 9 Pro4700 mAh
17 h Samsung Galaxy S24+4900 mAh
16.8 h Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version6000 mAh
22.1 h
Notebookcheck 总体评分努比亚 Z70 Ultra 以相对实惠的价格提供了强大的技术和多功能相机设置。不过，可持续发展性在这里退居其次。
Back to the verdict
Nubia Z70 Ultra
- 12/13/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Chassis87%
Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device91%
Connectivity67 / 69 → 96%
Weight88%
Battery93%
Display91%
Games Performance47 / 55 → 85%
Application Performance87 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance20%
Temperature21%
Noise100%
Audio74 / 90 → 82%
Camera81%
Average58%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials0%Packaging0%Power Use95.6%Repairability40%Software Updates39% Total Sustainability Score: 29.1%
More articles related to this deviceNubia Z70 Ultra (Z70 Series)News•努比亚 Z70S Ultra：拥有复古设计和出色摄像头的高端智能手机 |Review•努比亚 Z70S Ultra 智能手机评测：高端配置丰富，复古相机外观与众不同 |News•努比亚 Z70 Ultra：视频揭示全新 35mm 摄像头和另一个独特卖点
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 673500 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!
友情链接